https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331 Bug ID: 1294331 Summary: Review Request: erlang-oauth2 - An Oauth2 implementation for Erlang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: rbarlow@xxxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-oauth2.spec SRPM URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: This library is designed to simplify the implementation of the server side of OAuth2. Fedora Account System Username: rbarlow Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12323786 There are two warnings from rpmlint: Checking: erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-1.fc24.src.rpm erlang-oauth2.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib erlang-oauth2.src:43: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/erlang/lib/%{srcname}-%{version} 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This package does not build an .so file (it is only .beam and .app files). However, it is Fedora Erlang convention to package all Erlang libraries in %{_libdir} as documented here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Peter/Erlang_Packaging_Guidelines Because this is a convention, I think we should ignore these warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review