https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry Mikhirev <mikhirev@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you Zbigniew! > The "and Public Domain" part only applies to the examples. There are also data files under CC-BY-SA. I added them to -doc package too as well as license. > 1. You should split out a -doc subpackage. Should the %doc macro be used in this case? I thought that it is only necessary for installing with --excludedocs option, but using it for *-doc package is nonsense. However this macro is used in Fedora packages that I looked at. > Most likely the test is wrong. No, it is BR that was wrong. I added openblas-devel and removed blas-devel and lapack-devel that are linked statically into openblas. SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bizdelnick/neuro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00149626-dlib/dlib-18.18-1.fc24.src.rpm Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/dlib.git/plain/dlib.spec?id=be566ba74ab3cd34234bd9935c9cd25f931587f1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review