Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-java - Java binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233425 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-06-18 14:25 EST ------- [ OK ] Tested Arch with Mock: x86_64 (F-7 and FC-6) [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name match the base package %{name} [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL, LGPL, BSD, [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, and aren't redundant. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ ? ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ Ok ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ?/NONE ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ Ok ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ NONE ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. == Rpmlint output: == [ OK ] From SRPM package: silent [ ? ] From rpm package: W: mecab-java no-soname /usr/lib64/libMeCab.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review