https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837 --- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- >> - Since this is not a library, but a CLI tool, shouldn't the package be >> called borgbackup (or borg)? >> > I'm open to that. The whole resides in lib/python../site-packages and the > 'borg' cmd loads borg.archiver:main > Whats more common in the naming? > > So what now about the name of the package? Well, i don't see any guidelines about how to name a Python package w/o python- suffix but what Robert said is well-founded. - >cd docs; make SPHINXBUILD=sphinx-build-3 man For brevity, make -C docs SPHINXBUILD=sphinx-build-3 man - >mv docs/_build/man/borg*.1* %{buildroot}/usr/share/man/man1/borg.1 /usr/share/man --> %{_mandir} - %{python3_sitearch}/* %attr(0755, root, root) %{python3_sitearch}/borg/*.so In this way, the directory %{python3_sitearch}/borg is listed twice. You may list %{python3_sitearch}/borg/ (If you need to fix *.so file permission, use 'chmod' in the %install section) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review