https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- FSF address issue filed with upstream binutils: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19339 The spec was copied from... Fedora's binutils spec. I'd like to keep it as close to that as is reasonably plausible. While it is true that chromium doesn't care about ppc/s390, it might someday, and I'd hate to miss out on these quirks. ldconfig is not actually invoked because %{isnative} is set to 0. URL is correct. This is a point in time snapshot from upstream binutils, they run a git mirror on their end. License is technically correct (the best sort of correct). All the source code goes in a pot, the result is: Public Domain and GPL+ and GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and and MIT and BSD MIT/BSD are permissive, honoring the other licenses means you've honored them as well. Public Domain is the absence of copyright terms, nothing to do there. GPL+ and GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ is simplified down to GPLv3+ (they all upconvert to GPLv3+ since we have to honor those terms). LGPLv2+ goes to LGPLv3+ to be compatible with GPLv3+, and LGPLv3+ permits you to convey it under the terms of the GPL. Thus, GPLv3+ is correct. That said, GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ is a bit more appropriate, so I've switched it to that. * Mon Dec 7 2015 Tom Callaway <spot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.24-5.git1d8592c - fix defines to be globals - fix license tag - add COPYING files as license files - drop legacy clean section New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/nacl-binutils-2.24-5.git1d8592c.fc23.src.rpm New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/nacl-binutils.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review