https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288759 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- The description is nice, but a bit too high-level ;). Please add a bit of down-to-earth stuff like "this package can be used to ...". Where is it specified that the license is GPLv3+ (and and GPLv3)? python2-commit.i686: W: no-version-in-last-changelog That's because the spec in srpm is different than the standalone version. The standalone version is OK. python2-commit.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator_c.c python2-commit.i686: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator.pyx python python2-commit.i686: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator.pyx 644 python Those appear to be source files that should be removed from the binary package. What about the documentation? The documentation is nice, but maybe it's good enough if people can access it online. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review