[Bug 1273693] Review Request: scudcloud - Non official Slack client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273693

James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> ---
This would be useful for my work so I'm happy to do the review.

Note I'm not a sponsor but following FESCO ticket 1499[1] I can carry out the
review and once approved you can file a ticket at the sponsorship trac
instance[2] indicating you need a sponsor for a package that has completed
review.

My initial pre-fedora-review comments:

 * Remove all that commented blurb at the top of the spec
 * Group is not required and shouldn't be used in current fedora specs
 * Use %autosetup macro rather than separate %setup then %patch macros
 * You are referencing %srcname which is not defined


I'll add the more complete formal review within the next few days to add to the
initial comments.


[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1499
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/packager-sponsors/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]