[Bug 1288453] Review Request: python-CommonMark - Python parser for the CommonMark Markdown spec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #4)
> > You can avoid defining %sum. Just put the summary in the first Summary, and then use %summary in subsequent subpackages.
> 
> I didn't know that. Is there something similar for description?
Nope.

> > PYTHONPATH is normally unset, so you don't need to preserve the previous one.
> 
> It's more an habit to preserve it, but I agree it is not useful.
> 
> > You probably don't need to use sed to fix the shebang line. Just move 
> %py2_install below %py3_install.
> 
> Should the binary use python3 by default? It works, I tested it. That's why
> I put %py3_install last and corrected the shebang.
Oh, OK. Yes, python3 is preferred
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin].


> * Sat Dec 5 2015 Julien Enselme <jujens@xxxxxxxxx> - 0.5.4-3
> - Use only one doc package.
> - Use %%summary to avoid summary repetition.
> - Use %%__python3 macro to fix shebang.
> 
> 
> SPEC: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-CommonMark.spec
> SRPM: http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-CommonMark-0.5.4-3.fc23.src.rpm

- license is OK
- license file is present, %license is used
- latest version
- builds and installs OK
- new python template is used
- python3 is preferred
- requires and provides are OK
- no scriptlets present or needed
- rpmlint says: no-documentation, no-manual-page-for-binary, spelling-error,
python-bytecode-without-source. All false positives or ignorable.

You might want to add Suggests: python-CommonMark-doc to the python2- and
python3- subpackages.

Package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]