https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Francesco Frassinelli (frafra) from comment #4) > It seems to work. Maybe it should be included under a different %package. > > Spec URL: https://frafra.fedorapeople.org/copr/xxhsum.spec > SRPM URL: https://frafra.fedorapeople.org/copr/xxhsum-42-2.fc23.src.rpm Yes, Thanks! xxhsum is under GPLv2+ license instead libxxhash and licensed BSD see the heder of the .c/.h files Strange problem with cmake macros ... can add to the spec file this part? %package -n libxxhash License: BSD Summary: %{name} Shared Libraries %description -n libxxhash This package contains %{name} Shared Libraries %package -n libxxhash-devel License: BSD Summary: Development files for libxxhash Requires: libxxhash%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} %description -n libxxhash-devel The libxxhash-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing applications that use libxxhash %files -n libxxhash %{_libdir}/libxxhash.so.* %license LICENSE %files -n libxxhash-devel %{_includedir}/xxhash.h %{_libdir}/libxxhash.so %license LICENSE because xxhsum do not require libxxhash thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review