https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769958 John C Peterson <jcp@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jcp@xxxxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #10 from John C Peterson <jcp@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello James, The short answer is no. As I noted in my post dated 2012-11-01, I did get into contact with the organization at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), where the (now deceased) EQP author was employed when the original work was performed. There wasn't any formal procedure at ANL for the licensing or distribution of software when the code was first released. Consequently, the EQP software is not even in their own database of ANL developed software. They pretty much just gave me pointers to the "license" that is shown on the project home page (links below). I can forward those emails from ANL to anyone who is interested. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/AR/eqp/ http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/eqp/ If that "license" is not adequate, then the matter should be considered closed. My feeling is that it's highly unlikely ANL will be inclined to provide any further clarification above and beyond that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review