https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193 --- Comment #9 from James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.spec SRPM URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt-0.0.0-3.dev20151123.fc23.src.rpm I've used this within the mock chroot to obtain a valid certificate for my domain. The docs are poor at the moment at best (readme, changes and contributing) but that's due to upstream being pretty bad ... I'll write up something decent for man pages to pass back upstream during the F24 release cycle - but in the meanwhile the docs (and upcoming Fedora article) will be sufficient to get early adopters using rawhide to start testing. As I suspected letsencrypt-apache is a no-go for now (calls debianisms such as a2enmod) but that can come later as well ... This build has tests enabled in %check and has the python libraries themselves separated out from the the files in %{_bindir} as previously discussed to facilitate testing and switching to python3 when upstreams supports in in coming months. This build also adds a %ghost for /etc/letsencrypt as after first run certificates and configurations for the domains end up in here. Optionally we could create this directly in the RPM I guess ... up to personal preference... I've argued myself both directions in having the etc skeleton in the RPM or letting letsencrypt create it itself over the course of the day ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review