Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 ------- Additional Comments From jpo@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-14 16:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Regarding comment #16. The plan is to replace syslogd since its no longer > maintained upstream. This should be a drop-in replacement since its forked from > the same codebase. As such it needs to have the same status that syslogd had or > the switchover will fail. We could put a conflicts with syslogd statement in it > to ease the transition. Then you will have to use the same pidfile and logrotate file as used in sysklogd. At least syslog-ng depends on their existence. jpo ------- Additional Comments From jpo@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-14 16:14 EST ------- A longer explanation: Due to a logrotate limitation (unable to function if it detects the same file being rotate in diferent scripts) I had to ship the same logrotate script as shipped in sysklogd (same MD5 digest to avoid file conflicts). In order to be able to ship it I also had to modified the name of the default pidfile name used by syslog-ng. $ cat /etc/sysconfig/syslog-ng #--- # Syslog-ng command line options # See syslog-ng(8) for more details #--- SYSLOGNG_OPTIONS="-p /var/run/syslogd.pid" jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review