https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269603 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Please link to the raw spec file. Otherwise fedora-review doesn't work ootb. Yep, looks good. The %description is kind of hard to parse, but I don't use vim, maybe it would make sense if I did. I think you should change the Summary to be something like "Comment stuff out in vim using ...". - license is OK - license file is not present, but that's fine for a 35 line script that uses a common license :) - requires/provides are ok - appdata file is present, nice! - scriptlets are ok - latest version - fedora-review doesn't complain - rpmlint: vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcc -> cc, g cc vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gc -> cg, g, c vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcap -> gap, cap, g cap All OK. vim-commentary.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3695 HTTP Error 503: Service Unavailable Works for me. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review