[Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
IIUC, mcsdbd is a separate thing. It shouldn't be mentioned in %description.

%autosetup is nowadays recommended, especially if you have at least one patch.

- license is OK
- license file is present, %license is used
- ldconfig scriptlet is present
- -devel subpackage is split correctly
- builds fine
- latest version
- fedora-review says:

[ ]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
Please drop that.

Also, '%make_install LIBDIR=%{_libdir} PREFIX=%{_prefix}' is probably better
than the explicit make invocation.
And '%make_build CFLAGS="%{optflags}" LIBDIR=%{_libdir} PREFIX=%{_prefix}
DATADIR=%{_datadir}' can be used to trim down make invocation in %build.

Use find -delete instead of find -exec rm -f {} ';' .

[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in sdb-
     devel , sdb-debuginfo

sdb-devel should have
Requires: %{name}%{_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
(the arch must match too).

- rpmlint:

sdb.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.8-1.0e133f1.fc21
['0.9.8-1.0e133f1.fc24', '0.9.8-1.0e133f1']

Please fix.

sdb.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) radare -> radar, radars, rad are
sdb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US djb's -> deb's, dab's, dub's
sdb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cdb -> db, cab, cob
sdb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memcache -> sachem
sdb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vala -> lava, val, vale
sdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) radare -> radar, radars, rad are
sdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US djb's -> deb's, dab's,
dub's
sdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cdb -> db, cab, cob
sdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US memcache -> sachem
sdb-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
sdb-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation

All bogus.

4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]