https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042 --- Comment #9 from Mattia Verga <mattia.verga@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #8) > So firstly if you're going to have the obsoletes then the guidelines are > here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming. > 2FReplacing_Existing_Packages > > Which would require that the obsolete should be "< 1.2.1-7" by my > calculation. > You're right, my mistake. > I still don't think it's right though - if you push this with the obsolete > in order to build the new kde-partitionmanager then there will be a gap > where somebody who updates will have kde-partitionmanager removed. > > If you push this without the obsolete then you're right that nobody with the > current kde-partitionanager will be able to update this because of the > conflict but once you push the new kde-partitionanager then I think that an > update will work right? Well, to have kde-partitionmanager removed a user should choose to install KPMcore, at present there's nothing that automatically requires KPMcore. I think we're in the case stated in the guidelines: "If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a compatible enough replacement as defined in above, use only the Obsoletes from above." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review