Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-14 08:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #68) > (In reply to comment #67) > > I'd suggest a directory (say /etc/nspluginwrapper/plugins.d) that contains one > > file for each plugin. This would make it so much easier to sensibly ship plugins > > in their own packages, i.e. they only have to include an appropriate file, call > > the wrapper install utility and are set. It's a similar reason why we have > > /etc/ld.so.conf.d nowadays and don't let packages muck with /etc/ld.so.conf > > directly. > > I don't quite understand what it can help us. Consider this scenario: - I want to package a plugin - I want it to be automatically wrapped in nspluginwrapper if available With the scheme I described, I could just put a small file into a known directory and call the wrapper install utility. The utility scans the directory, and creates the necessary symlinks (or whatever it does). When the package is uninstalled, I call the utility to remove me and it removes the symlinks. I don't have to insert stuff in a text file and subsequently remove it and run the risk of erroneously removing the references to other plugins this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review