https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286322 gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- NON blocking issues: [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 87 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1286322-mathic/licensecheck.txt Please ask upstream to add headers license in those files where is missing [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Reported @ https://github.com/broune/mathic/pull/3 [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review