https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #29 from James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> --- As a side issue I'm personally not too keen with conflating this package with python-acme and building both as part of the letsencrypt srpm ... I'm of the opinion this should be a separate package request as well and another blocker on this... The letsencrypt-apache and letsencrypt-nginx plugins do make sense to have as subpackages of this srpm however ... My reasoning is that in principle python-acme could be used by other python applications/scripts and is effectively an independent entity to the letsencrypt client itself and thus should have it's own entry in bugzilla and be built separately, however the plugins only make sense in the context of letsencrypt itself ... Any other thoughts on this or does that make sense and pass as a sensible separation? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review