https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270513 --- Comment #6 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz <claudiorodrigo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #5) > Hi Claudio, > thanks for your review. May I assign this bug to you as you're doing the > official process? > > Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/newtonsoft-json.spec > SRPM URL: > https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/newtonsoft-json-7.0.1-2.fc23. > src.rpm > > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11986801 > > * Thu Nov 26 2015 Raphael Groner <> - 7.0.1-2 > - fix folders ownership > - remove obsolete generation of pkgconfig file > > About general discussion of devel subpackages for mono, see bug #477308. > <rant> IMHO it's generally ridiculous to blow up spec files with generation > of .pc files that does not bring any real benefit over rpm's own features, > but so I tried in first step. Instead, mono is able to resolve its > dependencies and there's virtual Provides: mono(Newtonsoft.Json) </rant> rpm resolver dependency yes, but without .pc file monodevelop could not reference the assembly in to any project for development propose. > > [?]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise > > justified. > > That's not needed, both patches are for Fedora only to ensure package builds > properly, see the comments. > > > [?]: %check is present and all tests pass. > > It's present and all enabled tests pass. We've to disable some tests due to > in Fedora currently unresolvable dependencies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review