[Bug 1279211] Review Request: python-gradunwarp - Gradient Unwarping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279211

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Oh, sorry, too many reviews in parallel :)

Pasting rmplint and requires/provides for reference:

$ rpmlint python-gradunwarp
python-gradunwarp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unwarp ->
unwrap, unwary
python-gradunwarp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
inhomogenities -> homogenizes
python-gradunwarp.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gradunwarp/core/interp3_ext.so 775
python-gradunwarp.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gradunwarp/core/legendre_ext.so 775
python-gradunwarp.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gradunwarp/core/transform_coordinates_ext.so
775
python-gradunwarp.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gradient_unwarp
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings.

All OK.

Requires:
/usr/bin/env
/usr/bin/python2
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit)
numpy
python(abi) = 2.7
python2-nibabel
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
scipy

Provides:
python-gradunwarp = 1.0.2-1.fc24
python-gradunwarp(x86-64) = 1.0.2-1.fc24

Oh, so this uncovers another issue:
- please add Provides: python2-gradunwrap when importing.

Package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]