Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 tyler.l.owen@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tyler.l.owen@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen@xxxxxxxxx 2007-06-13 19:28 EST ------- On Fedora Core 7: * rpmlint is silent * RPM/specfile name looks good * Group looks good * License is open-source compatible (GPL) * COPYING included in source and included in %doc * SPEC file is in English - FIX : SPEC file %description not legible it does not read very well (which I saw is directly from the README in the upstream tarball) * Source is the same as upstream * Package builds cleanly in mock for Fedora 7 i386 * Handles locales properly (uses %find_lang) * Package not relocatable * Package owns all directories it creates * No dupes in %files * Files section contains %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Valid clean section * Macro usage looks good * No large docs * No shared libs * No header files, static libs or *.pc files * No libtool archives * .desktop file included as Source1 - FIX: <vendor_id> set to blank ("") in desktop-file-install, per packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) should be fedora is not specified by upstream * Install starts with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * RPM installs and runs without an issue on Fedora 7 i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review