Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From stransky@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-13 14:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #59) Great, thanks for the suggestions, we can move forward now. > [root@newcaprica mock]# rpm -ivh > fedora-7-i386/result/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-3.fc7.i386.rpm > fedora-7-x86_64/result/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-3.fc7.x86_64.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > 1:nspluginwrapper ########################################### [ 50%] > Installing plug-ins for 64-bit browser... > 2:nspluginwrapper ########################################### [100%] > Installing all plug-ins... > Install plugin /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins-backup/libflashplayer.so > into /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so > Install plugin /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins-backup/libflashplayer.so > into /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so > > 1) You must quiet these messages during %post and %preun. Redirect the output > to /dev/null. okay. > 2) Please offload the list of plugins to wrap to /etc/sysconfig/nspluginwrapper > or someplace. It must be possible for users to edit the list and have it > survive package upgrades. okay, makes sense > 3) Please allow a config boolean like WRAPALL=yes or WRAPALL=no for users to > enable wrapping of all plugins if they wish it. (It would of course need to > avoid wrapping itself or already wrapped plugins...) It should be a part of /etc/sysconfig/nspluginwrapper, right? > 4) Cross-compile with --target=i386 fails here, although my builds done in mock > on both archs work. I think it isn't necessary to fix cross-compile but it > would be nice. > > ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4/objs-32 > ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4 > + ../configure --prefix=/usr --target-cpu=i386 --pkgdir=nspluginwrapper > --pkglibdir=/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper --with-lib32=lib --with-lib64=lib64 > --with-base-lib=lib64 --with-base-libdir=/usr/lib --with-x11-prefix=/usr > GTK+ 2.0 environment not usable > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3311 (%build) You may miss some 32-bit library (i got this message for missing cairo-devel.i386) > 5) Decide whether you want to use this packaging or the alternative that dwmw2 > prefers. I don't want to decide that. Definitely this one. It consists from only one package for each architecture what contains everything what's important (wrapper&viewer) and meets all cailon's requests. > 6) *PLEASE* allow ppc builds before the initial version of this goes into the > repo. It really wont take much to make it buildable. okay, i'll check that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review