[Bug 1200038] Review Request: generic-colouriser - configurable colouriser for logs and command output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200038



--- Comment #5 from Sanne Wouda <snnw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---

Thanks for the comments, Terje.

(In reply to Terje Røsten from comment #4)
> Some quick comments.
> 
> - BuildRoot: ..., %clean section, line %defattr(-,root,root,-) and line rm
> -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install are not needed, remove these

Removed the mentioned lines and sections. Thanks.

> - Use %license macro

COPYING is the license and has been marked as such.

> - Lines in %%description too long

The line was 79 characters long exactly, but I've made it shorter anyway.

> - Drop disttag from changelog, use: 1.9-1 
>   This way you can use same spec file for all branches.

Nice.

> - Add empty line between each changelog item.

Done.  Is this a convention, or requirement?


New links:
Spec:  http://www.stack.nl/~snnw/generic-colouriser.spec
SRPM:  http://www.stack.nl/~snnw/generic-colouriser-1.9-1.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]