[Bug 1269649] Review Request: aeskulap - Full open source replacement for commercially available DICOM viewer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269649



--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> ---
>So even if there is no active development, there is a valid upstream and the >possibility to get my build- and bug fix merged into upstream.
>
>There is still the option to fork the repo if it is easier to handle.

Good point of start.

>Release: 0.21beta1%{?dist}

If yours is a 0.2.2 pre-release, you should change Release tag like

0.%{X}.%{alphatag}%{?dist}

Where %{X} is the release number increment, and %{alphatag} is the string that
came from the version. In this case, the period '.' is used as the delimiter
between the release number increment, and the non-numeric version string.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]