Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-12 18:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > By the way, the upstream code does not really work with anything other than > i386/x86_64 AFAIK. Unless that's changed recently. We would probably need help > from various arch teams porting the code. The ppc port requires qemu, and I > really don't want firefox to (implicitly) require qemu. nspluginwrapper consists of two parts. I'm not entirely sure what to call them; I'll settle for 'plugin' (which is the x86_64 plugin which actually runs in your native firefox) and 'runtime' (which is normally the i386 bit that loads the actual flash plugin library). When you run i386 plugins in x86_64 you'll want the x86_64 'plugin' package and the i386 'runtime' package. There's no reason not to build both 'plugin' and 'runtime' packages for other architectures too. It wouldn't create an implicit dependency on qemu -- users would need to do something special to install the nspluginwrapper-runtime.i386.rpm on their system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review