https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270364 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- issues: - Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if present. Note: Package has .a files: nacl-arm-binutils. Illegal package name: nacl-arm-binutils. Does not provide -static: nacl-arm-binutils. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: Cannot find copying.c in rpm(s) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. nacl-arm-binutils-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/nacl-binutils-2.25.2-gitcde986c/bfd/elf-nacl.h nacl-arm-binutils-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/nacl-binutils-2.25.2-gitcde986c/bfd/elf-vxworks.c nacl-arm-binutils-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/nacl-binutils-2.25.2-gitcde986c/bfd/elf-nacl.c nacl-arm-binutils-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/nacl-binutils-2.25.2-gitcde986c/bfd/elf-vxworks.h Please, report the problem to upstream https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/arm-nacl, /usr/lib64 /usr/arm-nacl [!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define binutils_target %{_target_platform}, %define isnative 1, %define enable_shared 1, %define cross %{binutils_target}-, %define isnative 0, %define enable_shared 0, %define __debug_install_post : > %{_builddir}/%{?buildsubdir}/debugfiles.list, %define debug_package %{nil}, %define run_testsuite 0%{?_with_testsuite:1}, %define run_testsuite 0%{!?_without_testsuite:1}, %define run_testsuite 0, %define _gnu %{nil}, %define enable_shared 0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review