Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From caillon@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-11 13:08 EST ------- Quite honestly, upstream's build system design is broken. It meets a specific feature goal but does so outside of the constraints of rpm: shipping/building 32bit stuff in a 64bit rpm is plain broken. You'd effectively force an install of 64bit firefox to install 32 bit userspace since the idea is to make firefox Require this for plugins. Shipping things which interact with firefox in a broken way is a quick way to make my life hard and to upset upstream. Either we fix it, or we don't allow it in our repo, and I go through lengths to ensure that firefox will conflict with a broken package as I am well within rights to do as I have to maintain both our Firefox package and our relationship with upstream. Additionally, plugins out of process provides a benefit of not crashing the browser when the plugin crashes and we can improve our security defenses with SELinux being able to sandbox them into a different context. Those two reasons alone make it worth doing for every arch combination we support. This includes, e.g. i386 on i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review