https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #6) > Some remarks: > > - Version of so files looks incorrect: /usr/lib64/libccnet.so.0.0.0, > /usr/lib64/libccnet.so.0 Shouldn't this be /usr/lib64/libccnet.so.4.3.4 and > /usr/lib64/libccnet.so.4? No. Library version numbers and package version numbers actually are not connected at all (cf. info libtool). So, even though using "0.0.0" is likely to bug upstream and Fedora at some time in future (e.g. when upstream changes the API/ABI), using "0.0.0" is technically correct. Additional remark: I'd recommend to change Source0 into this: Source0: https://github.com/haiwen/%{name}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz#/ccnet-%{version}.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review