[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607





------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx  2007-06-10 16:26 EST -------
>  build of SRPM fails:
> ...
> [snip]
> ...
>  RPM build errors:
> ...
> [snip]
> ...
>     Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
>     Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info

Fixed.

> * Working directory on %build, %install stage

Fixed.
 
> * macros

Fixed.
 
> * Header files location

There is no object file or library installed by the upstream tarball which would
correspond to the header file. So wouldn't putting them in %{_includedir} be
wrong? I have asked upstream  about the purpose of these files, and waiting for
their reply.

> * parallel make

Fixed.
 
> * Timestamps

Fixed.

Here is the new SPEC file:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=gengetopt-2.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]