https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322 --- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng <i@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #11) > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10) > > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6) > > > From what I've observed, the usage of Chrome is pretty much because we don't > > > provide Chromium. > > > > That's just your notion. Google provides RPMs for i386 while this chromium > > only has ExclusiveArch x86_64. > > Enabling support for i386 is incredibly painful, though, now that there is > support for shared library components again, possibly less so. The biggest > issue will be getting the nacl/pnacl toolchains working on i386. I wonder > whether the 6 people still using ia32-only hardware even care. You won't need to care about i686 after CentOS 6/7 reaching their EOL. Now the fact is, vendor doesn't want to support ix86 while increasing the burden to downstream. I have to say I agree with Red Hat's decision but also big thanks to Google to let me still have ability to enjoy the Internet without Mozilla crapfox. NaCl is a serious issue indeed, I'm not sure if Fedora has loosened the guideline, but it's a blocker of this package, and solving this is not easy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review