https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546 --- Comment #45 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Gustavo and Michael. I just started a new fedora-review call, so will comment about other issues later. About versioning in release. The guidelines tell how to handle in a way that has less chances of having issues when upstream and rpm do not agree on versions, or what is newer. You can test it manually, for example with the command: $ rpmdev-vercmp 0.0.1.beta10-1 0.0.1.beta8-1 0.0.1.beta10-1 > 0.0.1.beta8-1 and what would happen if you called the final version 0.0.1: $ rpmdev-vercmp 0.0.1-1 0.0.1.beta10-1 0.0.1-1 < 0.0.1.beta10-1 Personally, I prefer to avoid messing the release tag, it is hard to maintain, and automated scripts cannot properly handle it. Michael, I was kind of trying to avoid too much complication on some packaging details, for the first package :) Gustavo, do you an ETA of when an official (non beta) package will be available? It would be desirable that the first official package in Fedora were not a beta one. But you can follow Michael advice on the release tag, then, after every package update, increase from 0.1.beta10 to 0.2.beta10 and so on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review