Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243573 ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-10 08:37 EST ------- Source RPM: W: python-memcached summary-ended-with-dot A Python memcached client library. W: python-memcached invalid-license Python * RPM name is OK * Source python-memcached-1.36.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK rpmlint of python-memcached: E: python-memcached non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/memcache.py 0644 W: python-memcached summary-ended-with-dot A Python memcached client library. W: python-memcached invalid-license Python Valid licenses defined in the rpmlint checks are 'Python license' and 'Python Software Foundation License' (/usr/share/rpmlint/TagsCheck.py) - Why the BuildRequires on python-setuptools? It uses distutils. - the PKG-INFO file in doc doesn't seem very useful to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review