https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030 --- Comment #9 from Joachim Frieben <jfrieben@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7) No, I am not "copying something entirely from somewhere else as an initial submission". I had attached the publicly available and free SRPM as a first *sample* - that is how I had labeled the attachments - as an inspiration in order to accelerate things for some potentially interested and already active packager from the Fedora Project. Moreover, submssion to Fedora is not done by uploading spec file and SRPM to Bugzilla. I have proceeded later on to creating my own SRPM after Björn's invitation to take care of this package which I wanted to upload to the Fedora infrastructure. >From the technical point of view, the package by "zhonghuaren" does not comply with Fedora packaging guide lines in several respects, and second, current upstream release is 0.9.3. In the meantime, I had prepared an SRPM from scratch based on release 0.9.3 that I was about to upload. Moreover, I am working together with upstream and have already repackaged giza-0.9.3 using GNU autotools. Thus, you are not only hasty yourself, you are even rude and offensive by interfering with a pending review request which had already been sponsored by another Fedora packager, namely Björn "besser82" Esser and without contacting Björn or me in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review