Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218577 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-09 22:14 EST ------- Crap, I was typing this up but had to break for dinner before I could submit it. Here's what I wrote: rpmlint output is OK: W: glump mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 13) Not a blocker; fix it if you wish. E: glump explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python This is a false positive. The package is necessary, and the dependency generator doesn't find it automatically. Marek is right; you should clean the buildroot at the beginning of install. Usually rpmlint complains about that; I'm not sure why it didn't. * source files match upstream: 634325e4efb057c5b849bf831a51ce8e7e11cec572b6769e9645f06443ae51ab glump-0.9.11.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has only acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(glump) = 0.9.11-2.fc8 glump = 0.9.11-2.fc8 = /usr/bin/python config(glump) = 0.9.11-2.fc8 httpd libxml2-python mod_python * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review