https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546 --- Comment #31 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Gustavo, My concern when asking if you plan to package other software is that sometimes, getting sponsored may not be a so easy task :) and sometimes one could have just one package in Fedora, and forget about it. People usually starts with a smaller package, and participate a lot on informal reviews, to show knowledge of the work flow and how to create good quality rpm packages; what an upstream developer may not have enough time to do. About the permissions issue, I did run: $ fedora-review -b 1264546 on this setup: $ ll /etc/mock/default.cfg lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Oct 4 2014 /etc/mock/default.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg and my computer is also running rawhide (as of 2 weeks ago). You also saw it in #c12 """ libsoletta.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/soletta/modules/linux-micro/network-up.so 775 """ I did a quick search, looks like mock uses an umask to group writable files since https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/mock.git/commit/?id=6533774ebda67addfb6e701246f3a96c5e62bcd9 The install command by default does not give group write permission, while "cp -p" copies it exactly. Once checking the next srpm, with %check enabled, subpackages renamed, etc, I can assign this bug to myself, and do at least one more review. Unless someone else wants to be your sponsor :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review