https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223990 --- Comment #10 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andrew Beekhof from comment #9) > - rpmlint is wanting the %changelog version to be '1.0.1e-4.el5.centos' This only happens as long as mock uses CentOS rather RHEL (while official EPEL builds happen against RHEL), so this disappears by itself. > - drop /usr/share/doc/openssl101e-1.0.1e/INSTALL Done. > - is c_rehash101e necessary? is there any case where it should be used > over c_rehash? perhaps drop it (which would take care of the > no-manual-page-for-binary) warning. Everything that uses openssl101e should use c_rehash101e, too. Background: With OpenSSL 1.0.0 the old-style hashing using MD5 was changed to SHA-1. But as usually both OpenSSL versions are around, c_rehash101e creates links in old and current style by default (to avoid breaking compatibility). However, before OpenSSL 1.0.2 there is no man page for c_rehash anyway in upstream sources (= no man page for c_rehash in RHEL/CentOS 6). > With the above changes I would claim this package meets the requirements. Anything else left? Given the only change is now the removal of INSTALL from %doc, do you need an updated package or would it be fine to perform this minor change after import into VCS (but before building, thus this gets trackable)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review