[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410



--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng <i@xxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jens Lody from comment #11)
> Minor issues:
> strange permission of source-file (640)
> latest version is now 2015.10.08

I tend to left this bug here because the reviewer is somehow questionable, and
upstream releases rapidly. The source TBH is a mess. Upstream even don't know
how to correct write makefile.

> decription:
> "AbcMIDI is a set which contains [...]"
> set of what ?

Set of programs, will be corrected.

> "[...]These programs were developed [...] and has been supported [...]"
> Shouldn't it be: "[...] and have been supported (plural)"

Will be corrected later, too.

> The explicit Provides looks strange to me:
> Provides:       abcmidi = %{version}-%{release}
> Provides:       abcmidi%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> can the pakage be arch-dependent and arch-independent the same time ?

Because you don't understand them. Michael had explained well.

> There are several warnings in the build-log, most likely harmless, but they
> might lead to issues:
> e.g.
> parseabc.c:322:12: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
> [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> parseabc.c:1062:1: warning: type of 'maxsize' defaults to 'int'
> [-Wimplicit-int]
> parseabc.c:1749:24: warning: format '%s' expects argument of type 'char *',
> but argument 3 has type 'char **' [-Wformat=]
> parseabc.c:1851:1: warning: implicit declaration of function 'appendfield'
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> parseabc.c:1316:6: warning: 'parsed' may be used uninitialized in this
> function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

I treat all warnings as normal things, sorry but that's my style, I'm only a
user from downstream, if it works, then just put it there.

> toabc.c:1491:8: warning: iteration 7u invokes undefined behavior
> [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]

fast-math and other flags or just higher optimization levels will cause this
issue, I singled this because I've met this for several times. I may repack the
cflags.

> apart of this, everythings looks fine

Thank you.

I will upload a new version of RPM soon, but please wait for a few days, to
wait for the reviewer get sponsored first.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]