https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265727 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in > libcacard-tools , libcacard-devel > > - Shouldn't matter, RPM should handle the lib dep for us IIRC Better fix it anyway. > libcacard-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > * Isn't this fine for a devel package? I don't think there's anything to > do here Yes, this is good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review