https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 --- Comment #13 from Jens Lody <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- I see that it in fact happens this way, but I think the guidelines are a little bit unclear in this case: From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages : "Examples of packages that should explicitly provide only arch-specific Provides: include native code libraries or plug-ins and their associated -devel packages. Packages that should explicitly provide only arch-independent Provides: include most stand-alone programs (in addition to all noarch packages). Even though these programs may themselves be arch-specific, clients that run them should not care about their arch in most cases. A package that explicitly provides, for example, both a native code library as well as an interpreted language interface to that library should have both arch-specific (for clients of the native code library) and arch-independent (for clients of the interpreted language interface) Provides:." abcmidi only installs stand-alone programs as far as I see. By the way after installing the package I get: [jens@localhost ~]$ rpm -q --provides abcmidi package abcmidi is not installed [jens@localhost ~]$ rpm -q --provides abcMIDI abcMIDI = 2015.08.31-1.fc22 abcMIDI(x86-64) = 2015.08.31-1.fc22 abcmidi = 2015.08.31-1.fc22 abcmidi(x86-64) = 2015.08.31-1.fc22 That looks like something does not work correctly or am I missing something ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review