Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl-0.9 - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-08 14:15 EST ------- > (In reply to comment #22) >>> * rpmlint >>> The result of rpmlint for srpm, binary rpms and the installed >>> rpms is attached. >>> >>> SUMMARY: >>> * Undefined non-weak symbols >>> - Two libraries have undefined non-weak symbols. > This means: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > -bash-3.2# ldd -r /usr/lib/libppl.so | sort > undefined symbol: __gmpz_cmp (/usr/lib/libppl.so) > undefined symbol: __gmpz_mul (/usr/lib/libppl.so) > undefined symbol: __gmpn_popcount (/usr/lib/libppl.so) > undefined symbol: __gmpq_equal (/usr/lib/libppl.so) > <snip> > ----------------------------------------------------------- > For example, /usr/lib/libppl.so contains undefined non-weak > symbols. For this library, perhaps linkage against /usr/lib/libgmp??.so > is missing. This should be solved now. >>>>> * About libppl_gprolog.so: >>>> This one. I thought I had fixed it by adding an -rpath option, >>>> ppl_gprolog works, but now I get the following: >>>> >>>> + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot >>> ******************************************************************************* >>>> ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/ppl/libppl_swiprolog.so' contains a standard >>>> rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] >>>> ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/ppl/ppl_yap.so' contains a standard rpath >>>> '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] >>> <snip> >>>> Net result: I am totally confused. >>> Your newest spec file uses --disable-rpath + adds ppl-0.9-makefiles.patch >>> to add rpath on ppl_gprolog. Do you see this rpath problem >>> on the newest spec file? >> Yes. > Please attach the full build log. I am i386 user and currently > I don't have this problem. I will attach it. >>>> Anyway, the sources with which I am working are: >>> I will appreciate it if you also upload the srpm, thanks! >> Because of the error above, the srpm is not generated. > rpmbuild -bs foo.spec just do so. Right. The files are http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-7.src.rpm http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl.spec http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/ppl-0.9.tar.gz http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-docfiles.patch http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-configure.patch http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-makefiles.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review