Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-06-08 13:07 EST ------- >I thought I had addressed this issue with the --disable-rpath >configure flag. I don't think there's anything funny in my makefiles >that should re-introduce it. Yeah, me too. Will investigate more... >It makes sense to link these statically. I will make it so in the next >ecryptfs-utils release. Well, not sure they need to be static... I think the idea was to move the libraries from /usr/ to /lib|/lib64. That would allow them to work fine for people who have /usr on a remote fs or the like. >It sounds like the key modules shipping with the ecryptfs-utils >package would best be statically linked too. Again, not sure static is needed, simply move them to a /lib/ecryptfs/ instead of /usr/lib/ Notting: Any input on static vs simply moving to /lib ? Thanks for looking at this Mike! >Re: kernel requires vs. conflicts; conflicts is what we've historically done in >packages such as initscripts, hal, and so on that don't work with older >kernels. ok, can leave the Conflicts for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review