https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265885 Jackson Isaac <jacksonisaac2008@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(michel@michel-slm | |.name) --- Comment #2 from Jackson Isaac <jacksonisaac2008@xxxxxxxxx> --- In Source0 is the '#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' (Git tag) necessary ? The release tarball and url with tag link/points to the same file. There are few issues related to licensing and 3rd party libraries being included in the source. I tried running zeal and clicked on open url but nothing opened up. I don't know if that if the desired behavior or I did something wrong. Other than that looks good to me. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora- review/1265885-zeal/diff.txt See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in zeal See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop- database ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 50 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora- review/1265885-zeal/licensecheck.txt ==> Files under src/3rdparty/qxtglobalshortcut/ are licensed with BSD 3 Clause by The libQtx project and also GPL 3 by the zeal project. Refer https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. ==> There is a fork of third party package under src/3rdparty/. This is also a reason for the licensing issue mentioned above. Refer https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Licensing If possible, it can be packaged as a subpackage. Awaiting reply from the contributor for further clarification. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in zeal [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. ==> %check is missing. Awaiting clarification from contributor if %check is required or not. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: zeal-0.1.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm zeal-0.1.1-1.fc22.src.rpm zeal.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zeal zeal.src:11: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ==> Couldn't find the zeal.src file. Can you please look into this and fix if possible. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: zeal-debuginfo-0.1.1-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.rcc zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.rcc zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.ui zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.ui zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.moc zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.moc 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- zeal.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zeal zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.rcc zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.rcc zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.ui zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.ui zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.moc zeal-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/zeal-0.1.1/.moc 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Requires -------- zeal (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme libGL.so.1()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Network.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Sql.so.5()(64bit) libQt5WebKit.so.5()(64bit) libQt5WebKitWidgets.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libarchive.so.13()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- zeal: application() application(zeal.desktop) mimehandler(x-scheme-handler/dash) mimehandler(x-scheme-handler/dash-plugin) zeal zeal(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/zealdocs/zeal/archive/v0.1.1.tar.gz#/zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : f4e959f9bc66a6e350ee8a33d34695379633432d103db9776c0c7a76cbc5a9d6 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 910a6ba4d2bf03fe5f5d4e5b9790b9f8148443035a2fb20de26ecc398ee5ae40 diff -r also reports differences Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1265885 Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 Attaching few files mentioned in review.txt that were created: 1. diff.txt Binary files /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/upstream-unpacked/Source0/zeal-0.1.1/src/resources/zeal.ico and /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/srpm-unpacked/zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz-extract/zeal-0.1.1/src/resources/zeal.ico differ Only in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/srpm-unpacked/zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz-extract/zeal-0.1.1/src/resources: zeal.qrc Only in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/srpm-unpacked/zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz-extract/zeal-0.1.1/src: src.pro Only in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/srpm-unpacked/zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz-extract/zeal-0.1.1/src: ui Only in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/srpm-unpacked/zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz-extract/zeal-0.1.1/src: util Only in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/srpm-unpacked/zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz-extract/zeal-0.1.1/src: zeal.desktop Only in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/srpm-unpacked/zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz-extract/zeal-0.1.1: zeal.pro Only in /home/jacksonisaac/fedora-review/1265885-zeal/upstream-unpacked/Source0: zeal-0.1.1.tar.gz 2. licensecheck.txt BSD (3 clause) -------------- zeal-0.1.1/src/3rdparty/qxtglobalshortcut/qxtglobal.h zeal-0.1.1/src/3rdparty/qxtglobalshortcut/qxtglobalshortcut.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/3rdparty/qxtglobalshortcut/qxtglobalshortcut.h zeal-0.1.1/src/3rdparty/qxtglobalshortcut/qxtglobalshortcut_mac.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/3rdparty/qxtglobalshortcut/qxtglobalshortcut_p.h zeal-0.1.1/src/3rdparty/qxtglobalshortcut/qxtglobalshortcut_win.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/3rdparty/qxtglobalshortcut/qxtglobalshortcut_x11.cpp Unknown or generated -------------------- zeal-0.1.1/src/core/application.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/core/application.h zeal-0.1.1/src/core/extractor.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/core/extractor.h zeal-0.1.1/src/core/settings.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/core/settings.h zeal-0.1.1/src/main.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/docset.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/docset.h zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/docsetinfo.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/docsetinfo.h zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/docsetmetadata.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/docsetmetadata.h zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/docsetregistry.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/docsetregistry.h zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/listmodel.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/listmodel.h zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/rename.sh zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/searchmodel.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/searchmodel.h zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/searchquery.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/searchquery.h zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/searchresult.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/registry/searchresult.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/aboutdialog.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/aboutdialog.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/docsetlistitemdelegate.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/docsetlistitemdelegate.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/mainwindow.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/mainwindow.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/networkaccessmanager.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/networkaccessmanager.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/progressitemdelegate.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/progressitemdelegate.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/searchitemdelegate.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/searchitemdelegate.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/searchitemstyle.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/searchitemstyle.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/settingsdialog.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/settingsdialog.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/widgets/searchablewebview.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/widgets/searchablewebview.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/widgets/searchedit.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/widgets/searchedit.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/widgets/shortcutedit.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/widgets/shortcutedit.h zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/widgets/webview.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/ui/widgets/webview.h zeal-0.1.1/src/util/version.cpp zeal-0.1.1/src/util/version.h -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review