Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: webmin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184080 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-06-07 20:54 EST ------- Hey Scott. I don't think Jason works for redhat anymore, so email from this review might not be getting to him. I am pretty sure the spec that he used was the one from the upstream project. Unfortunately there are a number of issues with this spec file, it would take a lot of work to clean it up to the point that it would be acceptable to the Fedora guidelines. I would suggest that you perhaps start submitting a easier package and get to where you understand the guidelines and how spec files are written. This link, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList has a number of packages that are not yet packaged and someone is wishing for. If you are set on packaging webmin, I would suggest you start from a clean spec file and build it up to match all the guidelines, which will be a lot of work, but I think easier than trying to clean up the upstream project one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review