[Bug 243012] Review Request: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib - Perl interface to zlib compression library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib - Perl interface to zlib compression library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243012


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-07 19:15 EST -------
Cool, thanks for that update.

* source files match upstream:
   0f60879a7b3fa4c6439a67271095d2e1e6d084f3395baa323bd9d405d0bd90ac  
   Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.004.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK (could use an extra "the", I suppose)
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   Zlib.so()(64bit)
   perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) = 2.004
   perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib = 2.004-1.fc8
  =
   libz.so.1()(64bit)
   perl >= 0:5.004
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(AutoLoader)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(Exporter)
   perl(bytes)
   perl(constant)
   perl(strict)
   perl(warnings)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=6, Tests=545,  2 wallclock secs ( 1.85 cusr +  0.10 csys =  1.95 CPU)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]