https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546 Gustavo Lima Chaves <gustavo.lima.chaves@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Gustavo Lima Chaves <gustavo.lima.chaves@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks, Piotr. > fedora-review fails to build, could you please run fedora-review yourself first > and fix the issues. I builds fine here. Would it be that I'm under f22 and you're running a > version? Note that I target f22 in this bug. I'll eventually put conditionals for exchanging Soletta's config file for fedoras >= 23. Let's see if you or someone can help with this fedora-review tool's output, though (just manual stuff, I got no ! entries). [ is this true or moot? ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/soletta/flow/descriptions, /usr/share/soletta/flow Now rpmlint: libsoletta.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/soletta/modules/linux-micro/network-up.so 775 I'm sure that under a virtual machine I get this file listed as 755 after installation. Is that any difference of umask during the tool's processing or what? > The beta5 can also be problematic as this is not numerical and rpm won't be able to compare with newer version. Please see guidelines: Mm, thanks. I'm now with the following schema, as read on the guidelines: %global soletta_major 0 %global soletta_minor 0 %global soletta_build 1 %global soletta_tag beta5 %global soletta_duktape_tag beta2 Summary: A framework for making IoT devices Name: soletta Version: %{soletta_major}.%{soletta_minor}.%{soletta_build} Release: 0.1.%{soletta_tag}%{?dist} > There are also guidelines on the Source, please see this section for the source packaging guidelines: Fixed, thanks a lot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review