https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223990 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Beekhof <abeekhof@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #5) > Created attachment 1073906 [details] > Diff between current OpenSSL from RHEL 6 and this package > > I am a bit confused now: Basically this package is a clone of an existing > package that theoretically should have been walked through a review already, > plus a few less changes (as per this diff). Well... the original version went through a review way back when and maintainers are supposed to keep their packages compliant with the rules, but sometimes mistakes are made and rules change. > > What has been removed (because it IMHO doesn't make sense to have conflicts) > compared to the regular openssl package that is needed for PKI stuff) are > the man pages and some (redundant) scripts. So in case some packages issues > exist, the likely exist in openssl in Fedora (and RHEL), too :-( Very likely, however new packages need to meet the criteria of the day, or at least address why an exception is justified, before they can be accepted. You may want to report them so you can incorporate the fixes or reuse their justifications. wrt. man pages, does the new one differ much from the existing one? If not, perhaps create a simlink so that people can see what it is/does (without needing to know the original binary name). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review