https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262470 --- Comment #3 from Globe Trotter <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx> --- Pete, Since Major did not respond yet, I was looking at this (I was the original packager on BZ, see the duplicate, now closed, which preceded this one). > - LICENSE file should go in every subpackage, not only -doc How does one do this? Separately, I had some warnings on rpmlint using my spec file: see 1234208 but , no erors. $ rpmlint python-PyPDF2-1.24-1.1.fc22.src.rpm python-PyPDF2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US decrypting -> decryption, encrypting, decrying python-PyPDF2.src: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause python-PyPDF2.src: W: no-url-tag python-PyPDF2.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{modulename} python-PyPDF2.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{version} python-PyPDF2.src: E: specfile-error warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Jul 11 2015 stat.maitra@xxxxxxxxx 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. maitra@alakananda 21:59:54~$ rpmlint python-PyPDF2-1.24-1.1.fc22.src.rpm python-PyPDF2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US decrypting -> decryption, encrypting, decrying python-PyPDF2.src: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause python-PyPDF2.src: W: no-url-tag python-PyPDF2.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{modulename} python-PyPDF2.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{version} 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Are these important? Of course, perhaps Major will respond with the corrections you requested/suggested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review