https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781 Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(hobbes1069@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #18 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #17) … > > => use of %doc with relative paths and installation of files directly into > > %_pkgdocdir in the same source package is forbidden. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation > > This needs to be better explained in the guidelines. Many packages install > documentation as part of "make install" but %doc is still used to pull in > the usual suspects, COPYING, README, ChangeLog, etc. > > I may post a question to the development mailing list to get clarification. You can not use %doc here, either ask upstream to enhance the Makefile or use install -p commands in spec file. … > > zipios-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency zipios-devel > > => Please fix. > > I think this one can safely be ignored. The -doc package only contains > documentation relevant to development, so it is actually a devel package, > but rpmlint doesn't have a way of knowing this. Please merge the doc package into devel. I do not see any reason why it's to be separate when there's the devel intention only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review