Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-IPy - Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239761 dev@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-05 23:30 EST ------- 1. Release: 1%{dist} should be Release: 1%{?dist} Package name: PASS (python-IPy) License: PASS (BSD) Spec Legible: PASS (en_US) md5sum matches: PASS rpmlint clean: WARN Builds correctly: PASS (i386) RPaths removed: NA Spec has %clean: PASS Macro use consistant: PASS Contains code/content: PASS -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: NA -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: NA Contains %doc: PASS (AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog PKG-INFO README example) Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: NA No duplicate ownerships: PASS rm -rf %{buildroot}: PASS RPM uses valid UTF-8: PASS %defattr is set: PASS No duplicate %files: PASS Not relocatable: PASS Calls ldconfig: NA Supports Locales: NA BR's are correct: PASS NA - Not Applicable NT - Not Tested rpmlint on build RPMS: Clean rpmlint on SRPM: W: python-IPy mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 16) SRPM lint warning can be ignored, but should be fixed, the disttag problem should be fixed before import and the debug define can be removed as it's a noarch package, however.. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review