Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GD-Barcode - Create barcode image with GD Alias: perl-GD-Barcode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241624 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-05 22:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Could I trouble you to answer the question I asked at the start of my review? Sorry -- missed that :( So. I'm trying to adhere to a blanket "always package tests as %doc" rule on the theory that even if I don't find it useful, someone else might, and if I were that someone I'd far rather look in %doc than pull the source from CPAN. (A variant of the "one man's garbage" maxim, one might say.) However, you're right, it's difficult to imagine a situation in which this test could be useful. (Unless, say, someone were looking for the test suite as an entity, or wondering how it was tested; however that's really a "meta-use" I suppose.) I included it just to be consistent in the practice of including them. In this case I could be dissuaded from this; I'd probably generate and include a README.tests with something like "test suite worthless as documentation" inside just to keep people from wondering where it is, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review